|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pollock
Begg Komar Glasser LLC
437 Grant Street
Suite 501, Frick Building
Pittsburgh, PA 15219-6003
412.471-9000 phone
412.471.9001 fax |
| |
Disclaimer
Custody in
Pennsylvania
In a custody proceeding, the role of the court is to determine the "best
interests" of the child. The court will consider the child's physical,
educational, spiritual and emotional needs, as well as the parents' fitness and
parenting skills, the child's physical, intellectual and emotional development,
the child's preferences, the location and attributes of each parent's home, the
qualities of the school systems, neighborhoods and facilities where each parent
resides, and other factors that affect the best interests and welfare of the
child. We strongly believe that no court can determine the best interests of a
child as effectively as the child's own parents. The Family Division judges are
motivated by the best intentions, but they do not have sufficient knowledge
about the children or their parents to make the best decision for every child.
The judges and court-appointed custody evaluators have very limited time and
resources to investigate the numerous factors that may affect a child's best
interests. That is why we always urge our clients to attempt to settle their
custody cases. In our experience, you will be more satisfied with a custody
arrangement that you have helped to fashion than a custody arrangement imposed
by a court.
In order to negotiate a settlement or go to a custody trial, you must gather
some information and documents to identify your child's best interests. We urge
you to keep a journal of the events that affect your child's life, such as
visitation with the other parent, school activities, family and religious
activities, medical and counseling appointments, and other events. You should
create notes to support your position, considering the following factors:
1. Characteristics of the Parents' Homes. This factor is not highly
determinative of the outcome of a custody case, but demonstrates a parent's
basic ability to provide adequate shelter and a nurturing environment for the
child. Compare the location of the parents' homes, their proximity to schools,
churches, day care, medical facilities and other services, the availability of
playmates and babysitters, and the quality of the physical facilities in your
home, including the bedrooms for each child. It may be helpful to provide us
with photos of the interior and exterior of your home and other facilities.
2. New Relationships. It is generally irrelevant in a custody case to
argue about who caused the demise of the parents' marriage or relationship.
Similarly, a parent's relationship with a new partner is relevant only if the
new relationship has a positive or negative impact upon the child or the child's
relationship with the parents. The court may consider the "morality"
of each parent, but it is difficult to predict the standards by which a Family
Division judge might measure a parent's morality. The Family Division judges
view many non-traditional situations, and most judges take a pragmatic approach
to custody cases. If a child is not adversely affected by a parent's new
relationship, then the new relationship may not be highly relevant to a
determination of custody
3. Status Quo. One of the most significant factors in a custody case is
the existing custody arrangement. The status quo custody arrangement is not
binding upon the court, but it is highly relevant if the child is thriving. The
Family Division courts are generally unlikely to disrupt a child's schooling by
changing primary physical custody during a school year, where the parents reside
in different school districts. Similarly, a parent may argue that the status quo
should not be disturbed if the change would disrupt the child's routines,
activities, treatment or other events. Furthermore, the fact that a parent
surrendered custody to the other parent upon separation may be relevant to the
issue of willingness to assume parental obligations. If you are seeking to
change the status quo, you should be prepared to give a compelling reason for
the change and explain how you would minimize the disruption to your child's
life.
4. The Child's Preference. A child's preference is relevant only to the
extent that the child demonstrates sufficient maturity and reasoning to persuade
the court to adopt the child's preference. The Family Division judges will not
permit a young child to dictate where he or she will live, just as a child
cannot dictate whether to attend school or what to eat or when to go to bed. A
teenager, however, may have significant influence in a judge's decision. We will
ask you to predict your child's preference, but we strongly urge you not to
attempt to influence your child or inquire about your child's preference. If a
custody evaluator is appointed to make a recommendation to the court, the
psychologist can usually detect whether a parent has attempted to influence the
child's preference. This practice reflects poorly on the parent, because it
places the child in the center of the parents' conflict. Many judges are
suspicious of notes or letters written by young children, because they are often
dictated by one of the parents. On the other hand, you may collect homework,
pictures or other materials that demonstrate the child's bonding to you.
5. The Parents' Availability and Work Hours. If a parent is otherwise
fit, custody will not generally be denied merely because the parent must work
full-time to support himself or herself. A parent will not be denied custody
where there is adequate provision for child care during the parent's work hours.
On the other hand, there may be significant advantages to full-time parenting.
In any event, you should be prepared to describe a "typical day" if
you are awarded primary physical custody, including who will provide child care
during your work hours, who will transport your child to school, activities and
appointments, and who is available to care for your child if the child becomes
ill while you are working.
To determine the best interests of the children in a custody case, the judge may
appoint a custody evaluator, who is a psychologist or social worker with
experience in the area of child development. The custody evaluator will
interview the child, the parents, the parents' spouses or significant others,
and other witnesses such as teachers, therapists, or physicians. We should be
familiar with what these witnesses will say to the custody evaluator. Therefore,
you should begin to make a list of contacts, including names and phone numbers
for the child's teachers, coaches, therapists, physicians and other significant
persons.
|